🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the crisis caused by the introduction of a new comprehensive peace framework for resolving the conflict appeared – briefly – to have been defused. A American diplomat spoke of "substantial progress" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its countermove: a renewed assault of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Diplomacy and Destruction

The succession of contrasting events captured the bleak nature of the outgoing year. By day, political struggles are waged: optimistic declarations are released from various governments. Significant resources is allocated on managing certain initiatives. By night, Russian leadership brutally reminds the world that, for them, war remains the primary tool for achieving "resolution".

Nighttime Reality

As Russia's attack developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's vulnerability was revealed. Ukraine is capable of detecting projectile deployments from enemy soil, a capability enabled by up-to-date information. From vantage locations, military aircraft that had been scrambled to intercept incoming aerial threats roared overhead – modern combat jets provided to Ukraine by Western partners.

Shortly after, Kyiv's missile defense engaged: several firings fired to intercept a Russian ballistic missile. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, most likely provided by Western nations. Every launch shakes the surroundings, rattling buildings. The instant of fear quickly transforms into sober acceptance: maybe the hostile projectile won't hit its mark this time, protecting urban areas from ruin and additional electricity failures.

Continuous Dangers

Following this, a heavy machine gun fired at a drone close by, part of a rapid response unit – most likely Western-made equipment. Regrettably, the projectiles didn't strike the hostile drone – it continued its flight toward its target.

Periodically, this continued until dawn. Kyiv greeted the early updates: several casualties, damage and utility failures in multiple buildings as a result of the evening attack. As typically, everyone still went about their day – living the war. But those 24 hours demonstrated Ukraine's critical military reliance on Western support – a need that European nations are evidently unprepared to fill in the immediate future.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The detailed framework from US administration generated strong feelings, controversy and deep concern – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after prior negotiation attempts and multilateral gatherings.

Every new proposal from US leadership follows the identical sequence: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, manages to fend off. They manage the tension but never actually win the battle. This cycle will, certainly, persist.

Strategic Calculations

It is tempting to accuse particular leaders of persistently promoting Kremlin's demands. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. US administration works based on a assumption well known to international relations experts: you cannot secure via talks what you have failed to defend militarily. The US administration presumes that it is impossible to force Russia to abandon the territory that it already controls in Ukraine's south or east.

The issue is that while recognising this factual reality, Washington does nothing to prevent Kremlin actions, through statements or actions, from thinking that the status quo will not shift further in its advantage in the coming year.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, the Kremlin is convinced that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its partners are coming close to fatigue. Their incentive to accept conditions that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is virtually nonexistent. There may be many attempts to end hostilities, but they will continue as long as Russia's government remains completely certain in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still persist, slowly losing civilians and areas but avoiding a total frontline collapse until circumstances change in its advantage.

Present Conditions

Realistically, there are no genuine requirements for a truce. Now, individual motivations are becoming relevant: personal goals to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Kyiv's double obstacles – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to unite the population around the national cause against any proposal Kyiv finds unsuitable, so that their focus does not move to homefront challenges. And although their objective will now be significantly challenging after latest incidents, it remains highly unlikely that this will change their overall approach.

These two forces are influencing discussions.

Summary and Prospects

It took a just a single week to eliminate the 28 points of the most recent proposal. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by American leadership, resistance by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with pacifying measures of diplomats, and finally, latest revelations, all did their job.

While new plans based on old ideas are approaching, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off negotiation assaults from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and demonstrate specific hesitation to modify developments, if they remain united and enhance their military capacity at a much faster pace. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to defend against evening bombardments will, for the coming months, primarily depend on continued Western support.